Multi context argumentative agents
نویسندگان
چکیده
We propose a new approach to designing agents based upon multi context systems and argumentation This approach allows the development of agent architectures which have a formal model in logic and a direct link between that model and its implementation To exemplify our approach we describe a case study of this relationship for a particular class of agent model namely the strong realist Belief Desire Intention model
منابع مشابه
Argumentation Tool that Enables Agents to Argue
Multi-Agent Systems are suitable to provide a framework that allows to perform collaborative processes in distributed environments. Furthermore, argumentation is a natural way of reaching agreements between several parties. We propose an infrastructure to develop and execute argumentative agents in an open MAS. It offers the tools to develop agents with argumentation capabilities. It also offer...
متن کاملSystème multi-agent argumentatif pour la classification des connaissances cruciales
Résumé. Dans cet article, nous proposons une approche multi-agent argumentative permettant d’automatiser la résolution des conflits entre décideurs dans un système d’aide à l’identification des connaissances cruciales nommé K-DSS. En effet, des divergences concernant la crucialité des connaissances peuvent apparaître entre les décideurs et aboutir ainsi à des incohérences dans la base commune d...
متن کاملA Context-aware Architecture for Mental Model Sharing through Semantic Movement in Intelligent Agents
Recent studies in multi-agent systems are paying increasingly more attention to the paradigm of designing intelligent agents with human inspired concepts. One of the main cognitive concepts driving the core of many recent approaches in multi agent systems is shared mental models. In this paper, we propose an architecture for sharing mental models based on a new concept called semantic movement....
متن کاملThe Effect of Multi-step Oral-revision Processes on Iranian EFL Learners’ Argumentative Writing Achievement
The purpose of this study was to explore the role of two multi-step oral-revision processes as feedback providing tools on Iranian EFL learners’ argumentative writing achievement. The participants taking part in this study were 45 Iranian EFL students who were randomly assigned into three groups. The participants of the groups were given three argumentative writing assignments, each assignment ...
متن کاملSystème dialectique au travers duquel les agents argumentatifs jouent et arbitrent : vers une prise de décision collective et débattue
We propose in this paper DIAL, a framework for inter-agents dialogue, which formalize a deliberative process. This framework bounds a dialectics system in which argumentative agents arbitrate and play to reach an agreement. For this purpose, we propose an argumentation-based reasoning to manage the conflicts between arguments having different strengths for different agents. Moreover, we propose...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1998